Home · Applications · Firefighting
Application

The first crew that does not have to breathe

In tunnel, underground car park and industrial fires, success often turns not on the volume of water but on how close anyone can get. An unmanned vehicle moves in while the crew stays outside.

The situation

When a machine goes in instead of a crew

There are incidents where an interior attack fails not on skill but on justifiability: a tunnel with unclear smoke spread, an underground car park with vehicles alight, a hall containing hazardous materials or a risk of explosion, a roof structure close to collapse. The incident commander is then left with a choice between exposing personnel to a risk that cannot properly be assessed and watching from outside.

A remotely operated tracked vehicle opens a third way. It withstands heat that no protective suit tolerates for long, needs no breathing air, and does not fail when visibility drops to zero. The operator stands several hundred metres away — with comparable machines, distances of up to 500 metres are common.

The second reason is more prosaic: staffing. A fire watch, an exposure-protection position or a cooling task held for hours ties up personnel who are needed elsewhere. A vehicle that holds position and directs a stream ties up one operator.

Tasks

Four things the vehicle takes over

Applying water is only one of them — and in practice often not the most important.

Fire attack

Remotely operated monitor with variable reach and stream pattern. The vehicle holds position at the seat of the fire while the crew stays at a safe distance — for hours if need be.

Building block: Water monitor payload

Smoke extraction

Before water comes visibility. A ventilation unit pushes smoke out of a tunnel, an underground car park or a basement and makes the area passable for crews in the first place. In documented deployments this has been where the machine actually earned its keep.

Building block: Custom payload

Reconnaissance in zero visibility

Thermal imaging and lighting deliver a picture from inside before anyone enters: where the fire actually is, where the hot spots are, whether the structure still holds, whether someone is in the room.

Building blocks: Thermal camera · Lighting

Cooling and exposure protection

Cooling vessels, protecting neighbouring buildings, containing spread — tasks that above all demand endurance, and where a vehicle never needs relieving.

Building blocks: Water monitor · Generator
Incident types

Where the effort pays off

  • Tunnels and underpasses — long approaches through smoke, heat build-up, no lateral escape routes
  • Underground car parks and basements — fire load from vehicles, increasingly with traction batteries, poor ventilation
  • Industrial and storage halls — large fire compartments, hazardous materials, collapse risk from racking
  • Plants with explosion risk — tank farms, gas installations, silos: areas one does not enter on principle
  • Vegetation and landfill fires — difficult terrain, long deployments, risk of re-ignition
  • Hazardous goods incidents — in combination with detection equipment, see hazmat and CBRNE incidents
Limits

What a vehicle like this does not do

Anyone procuring an unmanned firefighting vehicle should know the constraints beforehand — they determine its operational value more than reach ever does.

  • The water supply is the real tether. A capable monitor needs a supply line, and that limits range of movement and manoeuvrability far more than the running gear does. Operating untethered means accepting a lower flow rate.
  • It is remotely operated, not autonomous. An operator drives the vehicle on camera. Autonomy helps with routine, not with a situation that changes by the minute.
  • It has to get to the incident first. From the medium size class upwards that is a question of trailers and loading, not carrying handles — see transport and loading.
  • It does not replace rescue. The machine buys time and visibility for the crew that goes in — it does not go in their place.

For interior attack there is, however, a way around the water problem: CAFS and ultra-high-pressure water mist achieve their cooling effect with a fraction of the water. With compressed air foam, more than half the hose content is air — the line is correspondingly lighter and can be dragged further. That is precisely what makes a compact platform usable inside a building, while the large monitor stays outside on its supply line.

Platform size is therefore not a side issue: a compact platform fits into a stairwell and an underground car park, a large one carries a high-flow monitor. Which one fits depends on your buildings.

Configuration

A typical fire service platform

  • Platform: PALLAS.75 for interior attack, in stairwells and underground car parks — sensibly combined with a CAFS or ultra-high-pressure water mist system, because both need considerably less water. Larger sizes carry fixed high-flow monitors and hold position for long periods.
  • Payloads: water monitor, thermal camera, RGB camera, and for hazardous goods additionally the gas detector cluster
  • Extensions: lighting for visibility in smoke, winch for recovery and self-recovery, generator for extended incidents
  • System components: data link with relay nodes — the critical point in tunnels and basements — plus transport and loading
Discuss your scenario All applications